30-year-old sibling buys house with 28-year-old sister, demands to split mortgage into three when sister's husband moves in, they refuse: ‘He is not an equity holder’

Advertisement
  • Happy first time homeowner holding house keys.
  • AITA for refusing to pay 50% of the mortgage when three people live in the house?

    I (30f) and my sister (28f) bought a house together. We were going 50/50 on paying the bills, it was fine, but since then my sister has gotten married and her husband has moved in.
  • That actually didnt cause many problems, since we now were all only paying 1/3 of the bills.
  • However, my sister and her husband have recently gotten a joint bank account, and my sister now thinks that means we should go back to 50/50.
  • I disagree, because there's still three people living here. By my calculations, if we did that, I would be paying 50% and they would both be paying 25%.
  • Meaning I would be paying most of the household bills. I keep trying to explain to her how unfair that is to me, but she keeps insisting that it's unfair to them because the way she sees it, THEY are paying the majority of the bills.
  • Which I agree is the case, but that's because they're TWO people, and I am ONE person.
  • But it doesn't matter how many times I try to explain that to her, she just keeps saying that it isn't fair that they are paying more than me.
  • I will say that this is the first property I've owned, and I don't have any experience with marriage, so maybe it does change something??
  • But I genuinely feel like I would be getting sc ed over if we go back to 50/50.
  • I would really appreciate some outside feedback on this, I'm really stressed out by this argument.
  • AITA? EDIT: Yeah I do actually see how I'm in the wrong here. My sister never mentioned that the house is only in our names so we'd be the only ones getting equity, the argument was always that because they have one bank account it should just count as one person, and that frustrated me because that's not a good argument.
  • And her husband has never once gotten involved in the discussion, so idk if he feels SC ed over or not.
  • Smiling Couple Holding Brown Boxes
  • I do think he should contribute because he is using water/oil, but yeah the mortgage should be strictly on us.
  • We'll have to figure something out. Thanks everyone!! EDIT 2: Okay so we came to an agreement.
  • One detail I didn't mention before (because it didn't seem relevant but I'm seeing people mention my sister's husband taking up space so it definitely is) is that when my sister and I moved in, we made an agreement that she gets the bigger bedroom and I get the smaller bedroom. and the office.
  • But then when her husband moved in, all of his stuff got put in my office.
  • Which has always annoyed me because it felt like my sister was going back on our agreement by essentially giving the space to her husband.
  • So we talked it all over, and the agreement we have is that my sister and I pay the mortgage 50/50, we split all household costs 3 ways, and her husband pays a little bit of rent.
  • Partially for wear and tear, but also for the office. (Apparently he has a storage unit already that's full and is unwilling to get a second one.
  • Which I do understand so this is fine for now). Idk the exact breakdown but maybe it's 60/40?
  • Again, very grateful for the replies, I am well aware my living situation is stupid haha.
  • Blue_Letter_Bible One and done. OP you should be paying 50% because you own 50% of the house. If your sister paid 33% and your BIL paid 33% that would mean they should own 66% of the house and you only own 33% of the house. Unless youre willing to forgo 16% of your share... that's yours to pay. This is a good lesson why you shouldnt buy property with someone who isnt your spouse. EDIT: As I said in a later post the BIL should be paying rent and utilities but not 33% of the mortgage.
  • Gracaphanie Original Poster's Reply Yeah... my sister and I were pretty desperate to get out of our mom's house and we both had a lot saved up so it seemed like a good idea at the time. And literally everyone in our family thought it was cool af we were doing it. Now six years later I realize I'm in a pretty bad spot. They're gonna want their own house at some point, and I'm going to either have to buy out her half and then rent out the empty room, or we sell. I can't afford to buy her out and e
  • superjudy 1 Info: do you own half of the house? If so why wouldn't you pay half of the mortgage?
  • Gracaphanie Original Poster's Reply Yeah. That is a good point, I wasn't really thinking of it like that. It's not like he'd be getting anything when we eventually sold. We just always split it three ways and equity never came up in the discussion at all.
  • Virtual-Squirrel-725 You and your sister pay half the mortgage, he pays rent and you and your sister receive half each, and you split the bills 1/3 each. He is not an equity holder so he doesn't pay the mortgage, but he does live there so he pays rent and bills. I'll do rough calculations for you. If the house is worth $500,000, your mortgage payments will be about $2,700 a month. Rent is about 5% of the $500,000 per year, so about $700 a month for him. You and your sister are out of pocket $2,1
  • PassengerForsaken 793 If you're in the UK, anyone who contributes directly to a mortgage has an equitable claim in a property, even if they dont legally own it. Pay your 50% of the mortgage with your sister and then split the rest of the bills 33% each. Dont let someone whose name isn't on the title deed EVER contribute to your mortgage.
  • Dittoheadforever The way I see it, you and your sister should be going 50/50 on the mortgage and utilities should be 1/3 per person. You could also make the argument that he should be kicking in something extra to cover rent for himself, but good luck coming to an agreement on that.
  • sab222 Are you getting half the equity? Owning half a house with a couple sounds like a terrible idea
  • ConflictGullible392 Feels like it's fair for them to pay a bit less than 2/3 because a) they presumably share one bedroom while you occupy your own bedroom and more importantly b) you and your sister share ownership of the house 50-50, while the husband does not have any equity. But at the same time feels fair for them to pay a bit more than half because of the presence of a third person, especially when it comes to utilities. Maybe split the difference, you pay 40% they pay 60% between them? Or
  • CaterpillarLoud8071 Only owners pay the mortgage, maintenance and renovations, and split it equally. Non owners pay rent, which can be agreed on based on market rent. All occupants pay 1/3 of the bills.
  • ShortManBigEggplant NTA but not a smart move on your behalf. You should still pay 50% of the mortgage so you own half the house but he should be paying you both rent.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article